Skip to main content
All Posts By

Bright Blue

Bright Blue’s response to the second Queen’s Speech of 2019

By Home, Press Releases

 

Commenting on the December 2019 Queen’s Speech, Ryan Shorthouse, Director of Bright Blue, said:

“The Conservatives won record levels of support from people on modest incomes in the latest election. To keep them on side in the long-term, the Government needs to deliver more than just Brexit. There needs to be a laser-like focus on reducing their cost of living, improving their public services, and enhancing their local infrastructure and amenities.”

“This focus on so-called ‘left behind’ areas is nothing new. All Governments have tried to improve the lives of those with modest means. Doing so, after all, is a primary objective of government itself.” 

“Transforming lives and communities requires a lot of time and evaluation. The legislation outlined today provides a roadmap for further reform, but there will need to be much more investment and innovation if so-called ‘left behind’ communities are truly to experience noticeable change.”

“The political aim of the Conservative Government is clear, but there will be no ideological consistency to the methods employed to achieve it. The Prime Minister is more interested in political power than strict adherence to a particular set of principles. He will use whatever philosophy or policies he needs to support and maintain the new voters he has just won. He will not govern as a strongly libertarian, liberal, communitarian or traditional conservative, but do enough for all of these factions within the centre-right movement to keep them happy and united.”

Below, Bright Blue has responded to the announcement of legislation that is particularly relevant to our current work. It therefore is not an exhaustive response to the December 2019 Queen’s Speech.

Cost of living

  • Raise the primary threshold of employee’s National Insurance to £9,000 from April 2020.
  • The National Living Wage will increase to two-thirds of median hourly earnings within the next five years. The age threshold will also be lowered from 25 to 21.
  • Establishing a new £1 billion fund to help create more high quality childcare, including before and after school and during the holidays.

Commenting, Ryan Shorthouse, Director of Bright Blue, said:

The Tories’ pledge to raise the primary threshold of employee’s National Insurance is the best tax cut they could make, since it benefits those on the lowest incomes. But cutting taxes is insufficient alone to really boost the incomes of those with modest means, to make them feel that austerity is truly over. To do this, the Government will have to make the amount of financial support that those in and out of work receive through Universal Credit more generous.”

“New childcare funding should seek to improve the affordability, availability and quality of childcare at pre-school level rather than school-level. Pre-school childcare should be the priority for additional government funding.”

“The introduction and increase in the minimum wage over recent decades has been a success. But that is in part thanks to the careful evidence and guidance of the Low Pay Commission. To maintain the support for and effectiveness of a rising wage floor, the Low Pay Commission should advise first with the Government then setting the rates after.” 

Employment

  • Creating a new, single enforcement body, offering greater protections for workers.
  • Ensuring that tips left for workers go to them in full.
  • Introducing a new right for all workers to request a more predictable contract.
  • Making flexible working the default unless employers have good reason not to.
  • Extending redundancy protections to prevent pregnancy and maternity discrimination.
  • Allowing parents to take extended leave for neonatal care; and introducing an entitlement to one weeks leave for unpaid carers.

Commenting, Ryan Shorthouse, Director of Bright Blue, said:

“Improving support and rights for mothers in work is a welcome focus and will help to reduce the gender pay gap. It will be important, following the forthcoming consultation, that the right to request flexible working is made the default from day one of an employment contract.” 

Business

  • Increasing the tax credit rate to 13% and review what R&D-related costs qualify for tax credits.
  • Conducting a fundamental review of business rates. 
  • Increasing the retail discount from one-third to 50%, extending that discount to cinemas and music venues, extending the duration of the local newspapers discount, and introducing an additional discount for pubs.
  • Bringing forward the next business rates revaluation by one year from 2022 to 2021 and moving business rates revaluations from a five-yearly cycle to a three-yearly cycle. 

Commenting, Sam Robinson, Researcher at Bright Blue, said:

“The Government’s commitment to increasing the R&D tax credit rate will incentivise both employment and innovation, and is a welcome step towards improving the UK’s productivity.”

“A review into business rates is long overdue. Increasing the frequency of valuations will make the system fairer and more responsive. But with three quarters of small business owners saying that the current tax regime is too complicated, this review must act as a springboard for a strategic, comprehensive rethink on how we tax businesses.”

Public finances

  • Having the current budget in balance no later than the third year of the forecast period.
  • Limiting public sector net investment to an average of 3% of GDP.
  • Reassessing plans in the event of a pronounced rise in interest rates taking interest costs above 6% of government revenue.

Commenting, Sam Robinson, Researcher at Bright Blue, said:

“Given an ageing population and an uncertain global economic outlook, the need for increased investment must be balanced by fiscal prudence.”

“These rules are a marked departure from the previous stance of eliminating the deficit. Current spending must still be balanced, but this new strategy allows public sector net investment to greatly exceed that of previous years.”

“There is no doubt that the fiscal straitjacket has been loosened. But there is a danger that the Government uses this looser framework to run from the difficult fiscal decisions lying in the years ahead.”

Immigration

  • End the free movement of EU citizens under UK law.
  • Increase the health surcharge, for those staying in the UK for more than six months
  • The power to make changes to the current rules for access to benefits and social security coordination for EU nationals.
  • Introducing a new fast-track immigration scheme for scientists and researchers.  

Commenting, Ryan Shorthouse, Director of Bright Blue, said:

“Immigration policy is changing under this Government, quickly and for the better. The indiscriminate and failed net migration target is gone. And the Government is liberalising the visa regime for highly-skilled people, especially scientists and researchers, rightly aiming to ensure that Britain remains a magnet for talent post-Brexit.”

“We do need a controlled immigration system. And there are progressive reasons for this. Free movement across the EU is not sustainable. It is welcome that the Conservatives have dropped the net migration target, but we should have targets on gross levels of some categories of migrants.”

“It is right to increase the value and applicability of the NHS surcharge. Migrants should pay catch-up contributions for essential public services, which people who have lived here much longer have paid for over many years for themselves and their families. The Government should use its new powers and apply this popular contributory principle further, by asking new migrants to pay a new class of National Insurance for a short period of time.”

Education

  • Level up minimum per-pupil funding in primary and secondary schools.
  • Raise the starting salary for newly qualified teachers by 2022.
  • Expand the free schools programme.
  • Increase faster than school provision funding for 16-19 year-old education, including T-Levels and the FE estate.
  • Establish a National Skills Fund.

Commenting, Ryan Shorthouse, Director of Bright Blue, said:

“The Government is right to commit to increases in per-pupil funding and to raise the starting salary for newly qualified teachers. There is a real recruitment and retention problem within the teaching profession, so raising starting salaries should help. But the government now needs to also offer more extensive and generous ‘social mobility’ salary supplements, to incentivise more teachers to work in less desirable areas of the country.”

“The Government seems to be and should continue to prioritise investment in further and technical education. The financing of higher education should not be a significant focus of politicians and policymakers in the years ahead. The current student loans system is broadly successful and progresssive, and does not require significant reform.”

Housing

  • Abolish ‘Section 21’, which enables ‘no fault’ evictions.
  • Introduce a new lifetime deposit for tenants.
  • Provide a range of affordable housing options, including discounted homes for local first-time buyers, a reformed Shared Ownership model and a renewal of the Affordable Homes Programme.
  • Introduce a Social Housing White Paper.

Commenting, Anvar Sarygulov, Senior Researcher at Bright Blue, said:

“The Government is setting out a comprehensive housing agenda to help people in every kind of housing tenure. It is particularly good to see continuation of action to help private renters after the recent ban on excessive tenant fees. The abolition of ‘no fault’ evictions will make private renting more secure, while adopting a single ‘lifetime’ deposit will make it much easier for tenants on low income to move.” 

“The Government is correct in continuing to support a wide variety of affordable home ownership options to meet the varying needs of different people. It is vital that the Government operates these schemes by encouraging new affordable homes to be built in significant numbers, rather than simply helping buyers by making homes cheaper or making it easier to access credit.”   

“While it is good to see a commitment to a Social Housing White Paper, it is disappointing to see the lack of a specific commitment on increasing the number of social homes. Housebuilding in Britain has tended to reach significant numbers only when governments committed to building a significant number of social homes, and the Government will have to deliver them if they are serious about building a million homes over the course of this Parliament.”

Social care

  • Providing councils with an additional £1 billion for adults and children’s social care in every year of this Parliament. In addition, the government will consult on a 2 per cent precept that will enable councils to access a further £500 million for adult social care for 2020-21.
  • Urgently seek a cross-party consensus.

Commenting, Sam Robinson, Researcher at Bright Blue, said:

“This Queen’s Speech promises a welcome boost for the social care system, although this new funding will only stabilise the system in the short term. The Government rightly recognises the need for a durable cross-party consensus on social care, but the lack of detail on how this is to be achieved is disappointing.”

Pensions

  • Creating a new pension scheme to give greater choice for employers and enable people to adequately save for retirement and better predict their income in later life.
  • Enhancing the Pensions Regulator’s powers so it can respond earlier when employers fail to take their pension responsibilities seriously, including putting lengthy jail terms on the table for reckless bosses who plunder people’s pension pots, thereby building greater trust for saving in pensions.  
  • Providing savers with a much simpler oversight of their pensions savings by paving the way for the introduction of online pensions dashboards, giving people plain information about all of their pensions in one place for the first time. 

Commenting, Sam Robinson, Researcher at Bright Blue, said:

“It is great to see the Government adopting much-needed reforms, such as pensions dashboards, to tackle undersaving. However pensions policy needs a long-term, consensual strategy going forward. To ensure such a consensus emerges, the Government should consider setting up an independent Pensions Commission to assess the pensions landscape, mediate between stakeholders and advise on policy.”

Domestic abuse 

  • Creating a statutory definition of domestic abuse which emphasises that domestic abuse is not just physical violence, but can also consist of emotional abuse, economic abuse and coercive or controlling behaviour.
  • Legally establishing a  Domestic Abuse Commissioner.
  • Providing for a new Domestic Abuse Protection Notice and Domestic Abuse Protection Order.
  • Prohibiting perpetrators of abuse from cross-examining their victims in person in the family courts.

Commenting, Phoebe Arslanagic-Wakefield, Research Assistant at Bright Blue, said:

“Domestic abuse is a significant problem in the UK that affects millions, mostly women. However, currently, breaching a Domestic Violence Protection Order is not treated as a criminal offence. Through its proposed new legislation, the Government should make the breach of its new iteration of the Domestic Abuse Protection Order a criminal offence, as Bright Blue recommended in 2017.”

Disability

  • Publish a National Strategy for Disabled People in 2020.

Commenting, Sam Robinson, Researcher at Bright Blue, said:

“Disabled people continue to face needless barriers in the workforce, benefits system and the housing market.”

“The employment gap remains stubbornly high and reducing it must be a priority. But the Government needs to focus on the quality, as well as the quantity, of work for disabled people. This will involve improving retention but also ensuring disables people have better opportunities for in-work progression.”

Agriculture

  • Leave the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy.
  • Replace the current subsidy system, which simply pays farmers based on the total amount of land farmed, and instead reward them for the work they do, to enhance the environment and produce high quality food in a more sustainable way.
  • A seven-year agricultural transition period in England during which Direct Payments will be phased out.

Commenting, Patrick Hall, Researcher at Bright Blue, said:

“Changing how we distribute agricultural subsidies stands to be one of the most significant benefits of the UK leaving the European Union. Last year, Bright Blue called for a gradual shift away from the EU’s inefficient system of distributing rural payments based on acreage in the Common Agricultural policy, to a post-Brexit system which rewards farmers, land managers, and land owners for delivering ecosystem services – in line with the public money for public goods principal.”

“Today’s announcement that the Agriculture Bill will continue to be pushed through parliament is welcome, but the final Bill needs to lay the foundations for the introduction of a market-based, commissioning scheme so private and philanthropic funding as well as public funding can be leveraged to subsidise the rural economy and vital ecosystem services.”

Environment

  • Setting a legally-binding target to reduce fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and increase local powers to tackle sources of air pollution.
  • Mandating ‘biodiversity net gain’ into the planning system
  • Extend producer responsibility and introduce deposit return schemes.
  • Introduce charges for specified single use plastic items.
  • Ban the export of waste to developing countries
  • Introduce powers to direct water companies to work together to meet current and future demand.

Commenting, Patrick Hall, Researcher at Bright Blue, said:

“The costs of air pollution to our health, environment and economy are considerable. The Government needs much more ambitious legal limits, legal responsibilities and policies to tackle this problem. The Government should introduce the World Health Organisation’s guideline limits for all major air pollutants.”

“Local government needs greater legal responsibilities and funding to tackle dirty air. As a first step, the Government should enable local or combined authorities to make reasonable profits from the administration of clean air zones, which could generate funding for local scrappage schemes or increased electric vehicle charging infrastructure.”

“The Conservative Government’s plan to ban the export of waste to non-OECD countries is very welcome, as non-OECD countries are largely responsible for plastic waste ending up in the ocean. However, the Conservative Party could have been more ambitious in tackling the scourge of plastic waste, by supporting a ban on non-recyclable plastics.”

Climate change

  • In trade negotiations, never compromise on high environmental protection. 
  • Investing £9.2 billion in the energy efficiency of homes, schools and hospitals.
  • Increase offshore wind to 40GW by 2030.

Commenting, Patrick Hall, researcher at Bright Blue, said:

“The Conservative’s plan to increase offshore wind energy generation to account for 40 gigawatts by 2030 is positive. However, the Conservatives should have pledged to remove current restrictions around the development of new onshore wind.”

Beyond those on the lowest incomes, there are no incentives for those in the able-to-pay sector to improve the thermal efficiency of their houses, especially in rural areas where houses are typically older. There is a real opportunity missed in not putting forward policies that will encourage private investment in retrofitting, such as new ‘Help to Improve’ loans, which could save the Government billions while reducing consumer energy bills and emissions.”

Constitution and democracy  

  • Setting up a Constitution, Democracy & Rights Commission.
  • Repeal the Fixed-term Parliaments Act. 

Commenting, Ryan Shorthouse, Director of Bright Blue, said:

Since the Union is now very fragile, the Government should use the review of the constitution as an opportunity to work towards a quasi-federal settlement for the UK.”

“This could include a new charter of union, a new UK council of ministers, and – more radically – a new Senate to replace the House of Lords with all parts of the UK fairly represented.”

Vidhya Alakeson: Power to the people

By Centre Write, Towns & Devolution

In recent years, a series of high-profile closures has put the decline of the high street firmly in the headlines. The travails of household names like Debenhams, House of Fraser, Toys R Us, Mothercare, and many more have sparked renewed interest in what can be done to turnaround fortunes on the high street, as one in ten shops remains vacant.

Much of the focus has been on the thorny issue of business rates, with more than 50 of Britain’s largest retailers calling for fundamental reform of the system this summer. Clearly, there are big problems with the way the business rates system works – not least the fact that increasingly cash-strapped local authorities now greatly rely on business rates income, meaning any reform would also have to address issues around local government financing. But more significantly, focusing on rates assumes that the problem we are trying to fix is retail.

We cannot unwind patterns of online retail and consumer preferences for more locally grounded, independent services and experiences. We have to move to a new model in which high streets are places for us to congregate, to interact and to live our lives – places of entrepreneurialism, business and trading, yes – but also places of citizenship, not just commerce. Central to the emergence of this new model is a simple idea: that communities themselves are best placed to rebuild their high streets.

Our work at Power to Change in support of community businesses has highlighted the raw economic value of communities taking the lead. Community businesses can grow the local economy from within, harnessing the entrepreneurial talents of local people to revitalise the high street. In areas of significant disadvantage and dereliction, a community-led approach can create a much needed economic turnaround in the absence of significant interest from private developers and commercial businesses. Our new research estimates that there are at least 6,300 community-owned buildings and green spaces, including a significant number on the high street. Together, they contribute £220 million to UK Gross Value Added. And by employing local people and using other local businesses in their supply chains, 56p of every £1 they spend stays in the local economy.

There are hundreds of examples of community businesses and other types of community organisation bringing new energy and vitality to high streets and town centres. In the White Rock area of Hastings, a group of community-led organisations have between them taken ownership of seven derelict properties over the last five years. One, Rock House, has already been successfully brought back into use as a vibrant and financially viable hub combining a community kitchen, work space, community meeting space and affordable housing. The rest will be reimagined over the next few years to meet the needs of local people, working in partnership with local independent businesses in the White Rock area to create mutual benefit.

And in Anfield, Homebaked – a community-led bakery and community land trust – now owns the entire derelict terrace on which the bakery is based and are redeveloping it as a mix of commercial space, affordable homes and workspaces. Down the same street, Kitty’s Laundrette has recently opened, combining affordable, environmentally-friendly laundry facilities with a space for community activities. Working together, Kitty’s and Homebaked plan to regenerate the whole street which lies between them.

However, a number of barriers get in the way. Rents remain stubbornly high, even where there are large numbers of vacant units, locking out community businesses and other locally-minded organisations which might restore a sense of local pride and identity to a place. This would be less of a problem if communities were more often owners on the high street, but opaque and fragmented ownership, coupled with financial barriers, makes it a challenge for communities to shape their own high streets. Finally, current approaches to local economic priority setting means that community organisations do not have an equal voice at the planning table. They are consulted but are not decision-makers with real influence to shape how the high street evolves.

To ensure that communities can play their part, we need to make it easier for communities to become owners and influencers on the high streets.

To begin with, there are a number of changes that could be made to local economic planning, such as including community representatives in the governance of Business Improvement Districts and ensuring technical support for neighbourhood planning extends to cover town centre vitality.

There is also a strong case for the extension of the Right to Bid under the Localism Act 2011 to a powerful new Community Right to Buy. This extension would give specifically defined communities priority rights to buy land in which they have registered an interest, and a generous window of opportunity to raise the funds necessary to meet the price of the land as determined by an independent valuation. In addition, the new Community Right to Buy should include the right for communities to force the sale of a building or land if it is in a state of significant disrepair or neglect and is contributing to the decline of a neighbourhood.

To tackle financial barriers to ownership, Government should earmark £300 million of the additional funding announced for the Stronger Towns Fund to support community-led organisations to take on buildings and land that matter to them in their town centres over the next five years. This funding should include initial feasibility funding, capital funding for building purchase and, critically, revenue funding to support the early running costs of the building. To support communities to make best use of this fund, the new High Streets Task Force should provide access to capacity building for community organisations that successfully secure funding. An additional £10 million should be made available to the High Streets Task Force to provide this support.

For too long, not just in the high streets debate but across the broad sweep of economic regeneration policy, community empowerment has been seen as a nice thing to have in addition to the supposedly more serious business of tax reform, Whitehallled industrial strategy and so on. In fact, empowering communities is the most serious thing we can do in response to the decline of our high streets. Because when people take real control over the places where they live, that is when genuinely transformative change can take place.

Vidhya Alakeson is the founding Chief Executive of Power to Change. This article first appeared in our Centre Write magazine On the home front. Views expressed in this article are those of the author, not necessarily those of Bright Blue.