Skip to main content
All Posts By

Sam Lampier

The future of UK finance with Bim Afolami MP

By Upcoming Events

Bright Blue is hosting a keynote speech by the Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Bim Afolami MP, on ‘The future of UK finance’.

This event will be a keynote speech followed by a Q&A moderated by our Executive Chair, Ryan Shorthouse. Introducing the Economic Secretary to the Treasury will be Morgan Bone, Head of Corporate Affairs at Virgin Money PLC.

Date and Time

Wednesday 15th May 2024, 13:30 – 15:00 PM. Guests will be invited to network after the event.

Location

UK Finance, 1 Angel Court, London, EC2R 7HJ

RSVP

RSVP to emily@brightblue.org.uk

Can’t attend in person? Watch the livestream here and ask questions virtually via Slido here.

In partnership with 

 

‘Good Britain’ with The Rt Hon Andrew Mitchell MP

Monday 13th May 2024, 18:15-20:00

By 2024 Events, Events

Bright Blue is hosting a keynote speech by the Deputy Foreign Secretary and Minister for Development, The Rt Hon Andrew Mitchell MP, on ‘Good Britain’, where he will reflect on the past 14 years of international development and outline his vision for UK aid in the future.

This event will be keynote speech followed by a Q&A moderated by our Executive Chair, Ryan Shorthouse. Introducing The Rt Hon Andrew Mitchell will be Rachel Lindley, Co-CEO of the International Development charity Five Talents.

Date and Time

We are pleased to announce the new date for this event:

Monday 13th May 2024, 18:15 – 20:00 PM. Guests will be invited to network after the event.

Location

Hanover Communications, 2a Southwark Bridge Rd, London SE1 9HA

RSVP

RSVP through our Eventbrite, here, or alternatively email emily@brightblue.org.uk.

 

LIVESTREAM

Unable to attend in person? Watch the livestream via our YouTube here, and ask questions to the Minister via Slido here.

 

In partnership with:

Crawford Sawyer: Why we need to think seriously about AI deepfakes

By Centre Write, Economy & Finance, Politics, Welfare

If you received a phone call from your local mayor, how would you feel? “Great!”, you may think. “What a personal touch – I always did like them.” 

Now, consider that your mayor made the call in your native language, but you are fairly certain they do not speak Spanish fluently. Then, you turn on the news: it turns out that they used Artificial Intelligence (AI) software to augment their voice into speaking languages they did not know. How would you feel then?

Most of us would find this uncanny, unethical and intrusive – and with good reason. For the people of New York, this was not just a hypothetical situation.

In October of last year, the Mayor of New York City, Eric Adams, used AI to ‘fake’ his way into speaking Spanish, Yiddish, Mandarin, Cantonese and more in thousands of automated interactions with citizens across the city. Adams is a serial user of AI, having trialled an automated subway police robot in 2023 (to woeful results) and, notably, a faulty Chatbot designed to offer 24/7 guidance to local businesses.

It takes three seconds of audio to reach an 85% match to a voice, and one in four people have received some form of AI scam, with many impersonating friends or family. To use AI and deepfake technology in the way that Adams did is, simply, a lie. Despite passing it off as trivial, he would have gained significant stead in the eyes of many New Yorkers if not uncovered. What is more, it is a dangerous precedent for a public official to make, and a very thin line between that and electoral fraud. Earlier this year, the technology that enabled Adams’ phone calls was used to impersonate President Biden in scam calls. fraudulently encouraging voters not to vote for Biden in the primary. 

Deepfakes are forms of Generative AI that use machine learning to create ‘fake’, audio or visual, likenesses of real-life people – often without their consent. Whether constituents believe deepfaked content for its realism, or the public begins to distrust organic media, the mere existence of AI and deepfaked content undermines our epistemic basis for believing digital content.

Deepfakes are a present political issue, not a dystopian premonition. And in a year where 49% of the world’s population is set to vote, the question of deepfake fraud has become ever salient. ChatGPT boasts more than 180 million users, and the truth is that Generative AI is going to be an omnipresent aspect of society for the foreseeable future.

This is not to ignore the benefits of AI, both political and otherwise. It can be used to help voters articulate their political beliefs, to generate advertising material at a fraction of the cost and to synthesise large amounts of data to better understand political trends. As such, the question ought to be how we can effectively regulate AI and retain its advantages.

In light of this, effective regulation needs to address three imminent problems. First, the use of political deepfakes to lie to the public. Second, the generative use of unethical data. And third, the rise of misinformation in the political sphere.

Inspiration can be drawn from the ELVIS ACT passed in Tennessee this year. Here, the unauthorised use of a person’s voice or image without their consent was criminalised, as was the dissemination of unauthorised tools, services and algorithms designed to create the deepfaked voices and images. This would assuage certain ethical qualms insofar as a deepfake can only be made following authorisation from the person concerned.

However, this measure does not do enough to demonstrate to the recipient that it was artificially created, so it is still lawful to create a deepfake in your voice as though it were you (recall Adams). 

On this front, regulation designed to ‘stamp’ any deepfaked content with an AI accreditation – notifying its recipients that it is artificial yet authorised – needs to be introduced. This may be a soundbite at the beginning of an audio message or a visual cue akin to a trademark for an image or video. Such a stamp should only be awarded when the software that made it is entirely transparent in its data’s origin to ensure that the data was ethically sourced – and by a relevant authority. As detection software is becoming as sophisticated as AI itself, it is something that needs to be attempted if we want to retain trust in politics.

As education and awareness of the capabilities of deepfakes grows, the need for strict regulation will become less pressing. But, in the meantime, it is paramount that we implement legislation to make it explicit when a piece of content is made with AI. It is important to stress that regulation is not designed to prohibit AI, but instead encourage its ethical use.

 

Crawford Sawyer is a Masters student at University College London (UCL). 

Views expressed in this article are those of the author, and not those of Bright Blue.

[Image: Sikov]

Bella Wallersteiner: Why the Conservatives must return to the centre ground

By Centre Write, Foreign, Human Rights & Discrimination

In the turbulent waters of contemporary politics, the Conservative Party finds itself navigating treacherous currents. The recent local and mayoral elections have underscored a dire need for introspection and course correction. As the Party grapples with its electoral woes, it is time to recognize that the path to redemption lies in a return to the centre ground, anchored by pragmatic policies that resonate with younger voters. The Party must urgently pivot. A renewed focus on housing, the environment and investment, and a pragmatic stance on Brexit, are all imperative for the Conservatives’ survival and success.

The Conservative Party suffered significant losses across England, losing control of ten out of the 18 councils they were defending. Nearly half of their nearly 1,000 councillors up for re-election were unseated, signalling widespread discontent among voters. The Blackpool South parliamentary by-election alone saw a direct swing to Labour of over 20 percentage points, marking the fifth such loss for the Tories in the last 12 months.

In my home city of London, Sadiq Khan was re-elected for an historic third term, securing the second-largest majority in the history of the London mayoralty in the process. The Labour incumbent won 1,088,225 votes – a majority of 275,828 over his main rival, Conservative candidate Susan Hall.

Susan Hall was the wrong candidate for the job. It is crucial that the Conservative Party learns from these mistakes and selects a pragmatic, forward-looking candidate next time, capable of connecting with younger voters and inspiring a vision for the future of our capital.

It is clear that the Conservative Party’s current trajectory is leading them towards electoral disaster. The recent polling data paints a bleak picture: young voters are increasingly disillusioned and disenfranchised from the party with only a dismal 1% of 18-24 year-olds planning to vote Conservative in the next election. Instead of doubling down on divisive policies and ideological fervour, it is time for the Conservatives to return to their pragmatic, centrist roots.

Margaret Thatcher’s tenure as Prime Minister was marked by a commitment to fiscal responsibility coupled with strategic investments in crucial infrastructure projects. From the Channel Tunnel to the rejuvenation of the Docklands in London, the Conservatives demonstrated a willingness to tackle long-term challenges head-on, laying the foundations for economic prosperity and growth. Today, as we face pressing issues, from housing shortages to outdated transportation networks, the Conservatives must channel Thatcher’s legacy and prioritise investment in homes and infrastructure once again.

The housing crisis is not merely a policy challenge; it is a generational burden weighing heavily on the aspirations of young people. Skyrocketing rents and unattainable property prices have created a landscape of despair for many aspiring homeowners. The Conservatives must champion initiatives that prioritise affordable housing, such as increasing the supply of homes, incentivizing property developers to build affordable housing and implementing innovative solutions like community land trusts. By addressing the housing crisis head-on, the party can demonstrate its commitment to fostering social mobility and securing the future for younger generations.

One of the biggest barriers preventing young people from achieving financial stability and buying their own homes is the burden of high taxes. Scrapping national insurance would be a tangible way to show young people that the government is listening to their concerns and taking action to address them. By freeing up more of their hard-earned money, the government can empower professionals to pursue their goals and aspirations without being weighed down by excessive taxation.

Second, embracing green initiatives could position the UK as a global leader in emerging industries while creating sustainable jobs for the future. Rishi Sunak’s pivot away from net zero policies after the Uxbridge by-election was misguided and, as I warned at the time,  risked alienating young voters and stifling economic growth. Unlike his predecessor Boris Johnson, Sunak does not seem to see environmental policies as a priority or an opportunity for growth. This detachment could cost the Conservative Party dearly in the long run. 

Third, Brexit remains a contentious issue that has polarised the nation. The Conservatives must adopt a pragmatic approach to Brexit that minimises disruption and maximises benefits for all stakeholders. This entails prioritising trade agreements that preserve economic ties with Europe while forging new partnerships across the globe. 

Labour’s dismissal of a recent EU proposal to reopen freedom of movement for young adults was not only short-sighted, but a missed opportunity for progressive policy-making. While Labour fumbles, the Conservative Party should take note and consider adopting this bold proposal as a means to attract younger voters.

And finally, investing in infrastructure and regulatory reform can bolster the UK’s competitiveness and economic growth in the post-Brexit era. By steering clear of ideological dogma and embracing pragmatic solutions, the Conservatives can demonstrate their commitment to safeguarding the national interest while building bridges with the younger voters who value pragmatism over ideology.

Economic competitiveness and Brexit are not unrelated. In 2022, Andy Street told BBC Radio 4 that Brexit was bad for business, and that there had been “some consequences” for business in his region as a result. He went on to say that more support was needed to help exporters: “We do have to deal with the whole issue of how easy it is to export, that’s paper work, the physical movement… It’s also the support for business to export, so that is definitely an issue.”

Ultimately, these local elections were about the tale of two mayoral candidates who neatly reflect the ongoing battle for the soul of the party. Andy Street, the outgoing Mayor of the West Midlands, exemplified the kind of centrist leadership that resonates with voters across the political spectrum. Street’s focus on pro-growth policies, effective governance and collaboration with diverse stakeholders earned him widespread respect and admiration. His defeat is a loss not only for the West Midlands, but for the Conservative Party as a whole.

On the other hand, Susan Hall’s mayoral campaign in London was a textbook example of how not to appeal to voters – especially younger generations. Hall’s lacklustre candidacy, negative messaging and disconnect from the values and aspirations of Londoners ultimately led to her much more decisive defeat. 

I have voted Conservative my entire life, but I can neither confirm nor deny whether I spoiled my ballot for the London mayoral contest on Thursday.

The Conservative Party stands at a crossroads. To secure its relevance and electoral prospects, the party must return to the centre ground, focusing on housing, investment, economic growth and adopting a pragmatic stance on Brexit. Only by embracing centrism can the party hope to remain relevant and competitive in the years to come.

Isabella Wallersteiner is an Associate Fellow at Bright Blue.

Views expressed in this article are those of the author, and not necessarily those of Bright Blue.

[Image: pablobenii]