Skip to main content
All Posts By

Sam Lampier

Ludgate Lectures with The Rt Hon Sir Iain Duncan Smith MP

Tuesday 21st May, 11:00am-12:00pm

By Upcoming Events

We are delighted to invite you to join our next Ludgate Lecture, a series where we hear from prominent thinkers and decision-makers on the biggest issues of our time.

For this event, we will be hosting The Rt Hon Sir Iain Duncan Smith MP, Former Leader of the Conservative Party.

Iain will speak to Bright Blue Senior Researcher, Thomas Nurcombe, about ‘Dealing with China’.

Date:

Tuesday 21st May 2024, 11:00am – 12:00pm

RSVP:

This event is free and open to all, streamed on our YouTube channel here.

RSVP here for a reminder and all event notifications.

Q&A:

Attendees can submit questions, before or during the event, via Slido here or by using the code: #LudgateLectures.

Bright Blue: Help build wealth for those without it, don’t cut taxes on those with lots of it

By Press Releases

Bright Blue, the independent think tank, and abrdn Financial Fairness Trust, a trust working to improve living standards and personal finances for people on low to middle incomes, have today published a book, A wealth of opportunities, which offers a fresh and radical centre-right vision to help people on modest incomes build up and pass on wealth.

The book includes essays from 21 leading decision makers and opinion formers from different professional, political and social backgrounds, offering analysis and ideas across four key areas: acquiring assets; leveraging assets; sharing wealth; and drawing down later in life. 

The collection includes contributions from Sir Sajid Javid MP (Former Chancellor of the Exchequer), Lord David Willetts (President of the Resolution Foundation), Baroness Nicky Morgan (Former Secretary of State for Education), John Penrose MP (Chair of the Conservative Policy Forum), John Stevenson MP (Vice-Chair of the APPG for Taxation), Steve Webb (Former Minister for Pensions), Tim Leunig (Former Economic Adviser to the Chancellor of the Exchequer) and many more.

The Rt Hon Sir Sajid Javid MP, former Chancellor of the Exchequer, commented:

“Without a compelling centre-right vision on spreading wealth, we risk creating a generation that turns its back on the politicians who failed them. A generation that, without any capital of its own, becomes resentful of capitalism and capitalists.”

Ryan Shorthouse, Executive Chair of Bright Blue, commented:

“Especially in today’s economy, meaningful social mobility and security typically derives from income from assets rather than work. But the acquisition of most assets – homes, shares, businesses – is increasingly becoming the preserve of those with affluent parents. The centre-right should be deeply alarmed that Britain is becoming an inheritocracy rather than a meritocracy. 

“The centre-right rightly celebrates people building up and passing on wealth. But instead of wasting political capital and fiscal resource on cutting Inheritance Tax – which only helps people who already have lots of wealth – the focus should be on bold policies to help those with no or little wealth better acquire it and then leverage it.”

Key policy ideas offered in the essay collection include:

Acquiring assets

  • Government should offer a capital grant of £10,000 given to every young person at either age 25 or 30 to spend on any combination of four permitted uses: education and trending, deposit for a house, pension saving or starting a new business.
  • Relax constraints on high loan-to-income mortgages. 
  • Ease prudential regulations that deter banks from high loan-to-value lending.
  • Expand mortgage insurance schemes to give sufficient insurance protection, encouraging more lending to first-time buyers. 
  • Encourage longer-term fixed-rate mortgages, with 20-year fix-term mortgages with the ability to refinance as in the US.
  • Make it compulsory for rent payments to count towards a credit score.
  • Lift the cap on house price for what Lifetime ISAs can be spent on.
  • Offer bonds with a rate of return fixed above market rates, restricted to savers under 30.
  • Auto-enrolment pensions contributions for the self-employed, matching minimum employee rates rather than that of employers and employees combined. 
  • Give the self-employed the option to place up to half of their auto-enrolment pension contributions in an ISA.
  • Government should match pension contributions from the self-employed, with a cap on the total value of top-ups.

Leveraging assets

  • Raise the minimum contribution rates in pensions auto-enrolment from 8% to 12%.
  • Expand the range of providers that can offer Help to Save accounts to credit unions.
  • Allow banks to market and offer current account holders a Help to Save account.

Sharing wealth

  • Equalise taxation on ‘earned’ income from work and ‘unearned’ income from dividends, capital gains and rent.
  • Replace Council Tax with a Proportional Property Tax, with a flat 0.48% tax on residential property value.
  • Replace pensions tax relief with contributions-based bonuses, paid on individual and employer post-tax contributions and capped at £2,500 per year.
  • Reduce or remove the exemption from Inheritance Tax for certain asset classes, particularly agricultural property relief and business property relief.
  • Incorporate pension pot assets as taxable assets under Inheritance Tax. 
  • Remove the residence nil-rate bank for Inheritance Tax and extend the general tax-free allowance to £500,000.

Drawing down assets

  • Government should ask estates that qualify for Inheritance Tax and have not left money to charitable causes to contribute 5% of the estate’s value to a National Legacy Fund.

The policies advocated by particular individuals are not necessarily supported by other contributors to the essay collection.

 

Baroness Nicky Morgan, Former Chair of the Treasury Select Committee and Secretary of State for Education, commented:

“The uneven spread of assets in Britain, particularly housing and between generations, makes the delivery of social mobility exceptionally challenging. It is critical that, as the centre-right, we challenge this.”

John Penrose MP, Chair of the Conservative Policy Forum, commented:

“Britain taxes income in a thoroughly regressive way by systematically giving a better deal to the rich at the expense of the poor. The ‘haves’ are being subsidised by the ‘have-nots’. It undermines the fairness and legitimacy of our economy, our tax system and our society overall. By rebalancing our tax system from work to wealth, we would be better off.” 

John Stevenson MP, Vice-Chair of the APPG for Taxation, commented:

“The Conservative Party should never be seen as the party of high tax. Instead, we should aim to be seen as the party of fair tax. It being an unfair tax is what did for the Poll Tax – and Council Tax is now basically replicating this unfairness across the country. It is time to be bold and finally right the wrong that Council Tax has become.”

The Rt Hon David Willetts, President of the Resolution Foundation, commented:

“Assets matter much more than they ever did before. However, they are also distributed much less evenly than incomes. With no change in the distribution, the overall effect is to make our country feel less equitable.”

Karen Barker, Head of Policy and Research for abrdn Financial Fairness Trust, commented: 

“Wealth plays a critical and growing role in shaping individual opportunities, resilience and prosperity in this country. Indeed, wealth continues to rise as incomes remain stagnant, meaning inheritances are increasingly shaping life chances. This collection is an invaluable contribution to the policy debate highlighting the importance of ensuring people on low-to-middle incomes aren’t locked out of opportunities. It is also a timely demonstration that concern for these issues is not partisan- it extends across the political spectrum.” 

 

ENDS

Notes to editors:

To arrange an interview with a Bright Blue spokesperson or for further media enquiries, please contact Emily Taylor at emily@brightblue.org.uk or on 078414 19316.

  • Bright Blue is the independent think tank and pressure group for liberal conservatism.
  • This report is kindly in partnership with and sponsored by abrdn Financial Fairness Trust. Bright Blue retains full editorial control over all its written outputs. The sponsor does not necessarily endorse all of the report’s findings and ideas.
  • abrdn Financial Fairness Trust funds research, policy work and campaigning activities to tackle financial problems and improve living standards for people on low-to-middle incomes in the UK. It is an independent charitable trust registered in Scotland (SC040877).
  • Full list of contributors include: Sir Sajid Javid MP, Lord David Willetts, Baroness Nicky Morgan, John Penrose MP, John Stevenson MP, Steve Webb, Tim Leunig, Gerard Lyons, Arun Advani, David Sturrock, John Godfrey, Andrew O’Brien, John Oxley, Deven Ghelani, Sam Robinson, Sacha Romanovitch, Dr Rakib Ehsan, Emma Jones, Michael Johnson, Graeme Nuttall, Ryan Shorthouse and Thomas Nurcombe. These contributors and Bright Blue do not necessarily agree with each other’s recommendations.
  • Bright Blue’s Board includes Diane Banks, Philip Clarke, Alexandra Jezeph, Richard Mabey and Ryan Shorthouse.
  • Our advisory council can be found here. We also have 228 parliamentary supporters. Members of our advisory council and our parliamentary supporters do not necessarily endorse all our policy recommendations, including those included in this press release.

[Image: Deemerwha Studios]

Ludgate Lectures with Tom Baldwin

By 2024 Events, Events

We are delighted to invite you to join our next Ludgate Lecture, a series where we hear from prominent thinkers and decision-makers on the biggest issues of our time.

For this event, we will be hosting Tom Baldwin, Author of Keir Starmer: The Biography and former Director of Communications and Strategy for the Labour Party

Tom will speak to the Executive Chair of Bright Blue, Ryan Shorthouse, about ‘What is Starmerism?’.

You can buy Keir Starmer: The Biography, written by Tom, here.

Date:

Tuesday 19th March 2024, 14:00 – 15:00

RSVP:

This event is free and open to all, streamed on our YouTube channel here.

RSVP here for a reminder and all event notifications.

Q&A:

Attendees can submit questions, before or during the event, via Slido here or by using the code: #LudgateLectures.

A country for young people: tackling intergenerational inequality

By 2024 Events, Events

Join Bright Blue and Youth Futures Foundation for our half-day conference, entitled A country for young people: tackling intergenerational inequality.

The conference will start with a keynote speech from Laura Trott MBE MP, the Chief Secretary to HM Treasury.

It will also feature panel sessions on four major issues affecting millennials and those in Generation Z: housing, families, post-16 education and work.

Agenda

11:45am | Registration

12.00pm | Welcome by Ryan Shorthouse, Executive Chair of Bright Blue, and Barry Fletcher, Chief Executive of Youth Futures Foundation

12:05pm | Keynote speech by Laura Trott CBE MP, Chief Secretary to HM Treasury

12:35pm | Q&A session led by Ryan Shorthouse, Executive Chair of Bright Blue

13:15pm | Panel Event A (Families) & Panel Event B (Post-16 Education)

14:15pm | Coffee break and networking

15:15pm | Panel Event C (Housing) & Panel Event D (Work)

16:15pm | Closing remarks

16:30pm | Conference ends

This conference offers a unique opportunity for delegates to discuss what can be done to improve life opportunities and living standards for young adults.

Confirmed speakers in the panel sessions include:

Panel Event A (Families):

  • David Simmonds MP CBE, Secretary of the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Children
  • Baroness Helena Morrissey, Founder, The 30% Club
  • Phoebe Arslanagić-Little, Head of the New Deal for Parents, Onward
  • Anne Longfield OBE, Executive Chair, Centre for Young Lives
  • Thomas Nurcombe, Researcher, Bright Blue (Chair)

Panel Event B (Post-16 Education):

  • Rachel Sylvester, Chair, The Times Education Commission
  • Doniya Soni-Clark, Head of Policy, Multiverse
  • David Thomas OBE, CEO, Axiom Maths and Former Policy Adviser, DofE
  • John Blake, Director for Fair Access and Participation, Office for Students
  • Lord Johnson of Marylebone, Chairman of FutureLearn
  • Barry Fletcher, CEO, Youth Futures Foundation (Chair)

Panel Event C (Housing):

  • Richard Bacon MP, Officer, APPG on Housing and Social Mobility
  • Freddie Poser, Director, Priced Out UK
  • Polly Neate, Chief Executive, Shelter
  • Tom Copley, Deputy Mayor for Housing, London City Hall
  • Victoria Spratt, Housing Editor, The i Paper
  • Bartek Staniszewski, Senior Researcher, Bright Blue (Chair)


Panel Event D (Work)

  • Justin Madders MP, Shadow Minister, Employment Rights and Protections
  • Matt Warman MP, Co-Chair, APPG on the Future of Work
  • Barry Fletcher, CEO, Youth Futures Foundation
  • Tera Allas CBE, Director of Research and Economics, McKinsey & Company
  • Matt Williams, Senior Partnerships Manager, Enterprise Nation
  • Yi Kang, Future Voices Group Member, Youth Futures Foundation
  • Alexandra Jezeph, Non-Executive Director, Bright Blue (Chair)


More speakers to be announced

Venue

H/Advisors Maitland, 3 Pancras Sq, London N1C 4AG, UK

Date and time

Monday 18th March 2024, 11:45am – 16:30pm

RSVP

This event is free and open to all, but pre-registration is required. Please RSVP here.

Can’t make it? Watch the live stream of Laura Trott’s keynote speech here, and ask questions via Slido here.

If you have any questions about the event please contact Emily Taylor, our Communications Officer, emily@brightblue.org.uk.

Exhibiting

We have a variety of exhibition spaces open throughout our networking spaces. Get in touch here if you are interested in exhibiting at our conference.

Isabella Wallersteiner: Defending Reality – Why Asserting Biological Truths is Essential to Women’s Grassroots Sport

By Centre Write, Foreign, Isabella Wallersteiner, Law & Justice, Politics

In the world of sports, where milliseconds and millimetres often separate champions from contenders, fairness is everything. This is a point that has largely been lost on politicians gripped by identitarian politics and wrangling over whether a woman can have a penis, with Orwellian rhetoric from our public sector bodies increasingly seeking to manipulate language and redefine truth to fit a particular ideological agenda.

In such an environment, the Labour leader, Sir Keir Starmer’s belated support for measures to protect the female category of sporting competitions this week is appreciated. After previously declining to publicly confirm his position, Starmer has since said he is “supportive” of measures which protect the female category of sporting competitions. Although, the Labour leader gave no specifics about how this would be done at a grassroots level. 

In the context of grassroots sports, there is a growing discussion about the necessity of segregating sports by sex to ensure fair competition. This debate has ramped up after it was reported by the Policy Exchange think tank that biological men hold at least three Parkrun female records because of its policy that lets entrants self-identify their gender. Parkrun subsequently removed gender, course and age records from its websites after rejecting a campaign to make transgender runners record their sex at birth. A decision which will no doubt have harmful repercussions on female participation, motivation and sense of belonging in the event. 

During a recent ultra-marathon event around the Jurassic Coast, I crossed the finish line in fifth place among female competitors, marking a significant personal achievement. Without sex-specific categories, amateur athletes like myself may find ourselves overshadowed, with opportunities for recognition and advancement in the sport hindered. When I reached the final checkpoint of the race at 45K, the first question I put to the race wardens – between gulps of Lucozade and mouthfuls of Haribo – is where I was amongst the female competitors. Having access to women-only categories in the ultra-marathon meant I could challenge myself to be the best I could be and push my limits without feeling outdone by biologically superior male competitors. If you take away sex-specific categories from grassroots sport – i.e. those sports practised at a non-professional level for health, educational or social purposes – you take all of this away from female competitors. 

Calling for grassroots sport to be sex-segregated should not be controversial. The physiological advantages that men possess over women in sports have long been known, encompassing factors such as bone density, hormonal influence and cardiovascular function. One of the most notable physiological differences between men and women is muscle mass and strength. On average, men have a higher proportion of muscle mass and greater muscle strength compared to women. This inherent advantage enables men to generate more power and exert greater force during athletic movements such as sprinting, jumping and lifting weights. Consequently, male athletes often excel in sports that require explosive power and physical dominance, such as sprinting, weightlifting and football.

Another factor contributing to the male-female disparity in sports performance is bone density and skeletal structure. Men typically have denser bones and larger skeletal frames, providing greater support and stability during high-impact activities. This advantage not only reduces the risk of injuries but also enhances overall performance, particularly in sports that involve contact, collisions, and repetitive stress on the bones and joints. Sports like rugby, basketball and gymnastics – which demand robust skeletal support – often showcase the benefits of male physiology.

Testosterone, the primary male sex hormone, plays a crucial role in shaping physiological characteristics that confer athletic advantages. Men naturally produce higher levels of testosterone, which stimulates muscle growth, increases red blood cell production and enhances aerobic capacity. These hormonal differences contribute to greater muscle mass, faster recovery times and improved endurance among male athletes. While women also produce testosterone, albeit in smaller quantities, the disparity in hormone levels can influence athletic performance, particularly in endurance-based sports like cycling, distance running and swimming.

While both sexes are capable of extraordinary athletic achievements, understanding and acknowledging these inherent differences is essential for promoting fairness, inclusivity and participation. At a grassroots level, female categories undoubtedly encourage greater participation among female athletes by removing barriers and obstacles that may deter them from joining sports activities. For many women, the opportunity to compete against other women can also be a catalyst for overcoming cultural, social and logistical challenges that may otherwise hinder their involvement in sports.

Whilst Keir Starmer’s intervention this week is welcome, policymakers must go further to protect female sport at a grassroots level. This could be providing financial incentives for sports clubs and organisations that prioritise the development and promotion of female-only categories, such as grants, subsidies and sponsorship opportunities – and removing funding from those which do not. The Government should also look to enact legislation requiring sports clubs and organisations to adopt gender equality policies that prioritise female participation and representation in decision-making roles. 

Above all, we need to fix the Equality Act, as championed by former Prime Minister Liz Truss and former Home Secretary Suella Braverman this week, to ensure that sex means biological sex. By clarifying that “sex” in the Equality Act refers to biological sex, policymakers can establish a clear framework for ensuring fair competition and preserving the integrity of women’s sports.

Women-only categories in sports play a vital role in encouraging female participation and providing opportunities for women and girls to excel. However, the inclusion of transgender athletes in these categories, without regard for biological sex, will undermine the progress that has been made in promoting women’s sports. By reaffirming the importance of female-only categories through legislative reform, policymakers can send a powerful message about the value of women’s participation in sports and the need to protect their rights and opportunities.

From trailblazing Olympians like Wilma Rudolph and Nadia Comaneci, to the athlete-activism of Billie-Jean King and Martina Navratilova, women have left an indelible mark on sports history through their unparalleled achievements and contributions. By maintaining women’s categories at a grassroots level, we honour the legacy of these remarkable athletes and we affirm our commitment to creating a future where every female athlete has the chance to pursue her passion, fulfil her potential and leave her mark on the world of sports.

As we navigate complex debates surrounding gender identity and expression, let us remain vigilant in defending clarity, integrity and respect in discourse, ensuring that truth triumphs over Orwellian distortion.

Isabella Wallersteiner is an Associate Fellow at Bright Blue.

Views expressed in this article are those of the author, and not necessarily those of Bright Blue.